Using PA-CAT in PA Program Admissions: What Does It Add to the Applicant File?
PA admissions committees already consider a substantial amount of information.
GPA and prerequisite coursework provide a record of prior academic performance. Healthcare experience provides another perspective on an applicant’s preparation. Interviews, personal statements, recommendations, and other program-defined criteria add context that academic measures alone cannot provide.
So why would a program add another measure?
For programs that use the Physician Assistant College Admissions Test (PA-CAT) during admissions, the value is not in replacing those existing sources of information. It is in answering a different question:
What does the applicant currently demonstrate across the prerequisite sciences relevant to PA education?
That makes PA-CAT one potential component of a broader admissions process—not a stand-alone decision about who should or should not be admitted.
Different Parts of an Application Provide Different Information
Holistic admissions works precisely because no single measure captures everything a program may want to understand about an applicant.
A transcript tells a program what courses an applicant completed and how that student performed academically.
An interview may provide insight into communication, experiences, goals, or other qualities the program has identified as important.
Clinical and healthcare experience document another part of the applicant’s preparation.
PA-CAT adds a standardized measure of knowledge and application across prerequisite science areas commonly relevant to PA education. The current assessment contains 240 items covering nine prerequisite science subjects.
Those measures should not be treated as interchangeable.
They answer different questions.
And for admissions committees, that distinction can be useful.
PA-CAT is an Additional Data Point—Not a Replacement For Holistic Review
One of the most important things to understand about using PA-CAT in admissions is what the assessment is not intended to do.
A PA-CAT score does not need to replace GPA.
It does not replace interviews, experiences, personal statements, or other information a program considers important.
And it should not be interpreted as a guarantee that an individual applicant will—or will not—succeed in PA school.
Instead, programs can consider PA-CAT results alongside the other information in the applicant file.
For one program, that may mean incorporating the score into a formal admissions rubric. Another may use it as one academic indicator among several. How much weight to assign it, how to interpret it, and how it fits within the admissions process remain program-level decisions.
There is no single implementation model that every PA program needs to follow.
Why an Additional Measure of Prerequisite Science Knowledge Can Matter
Applicants arrive through different academic pathways.
Some completed their prerequisite sciences recently. Others may have taken them years earlier. Some completed coursework across several institutions or returned to school after time in the workforce.
A transcript records that academic history.
A prerequisite-science assessment provides something different: a common measurement point at the time of application.
That distinction is important.
The question is not whether one measure should replace the other. It is whether the combination gives the admissions committee useful information that it would not otherwise have.
For programs considering PA-CAT, a useful starting question may therefore be: What do we want to know about an applicant that our current admissions data do not directly answer?
If the answer involves current prerequisite-science knowledge, a standardized assessment may add relevant information to the broader applicant picture.
Admissions Data Become More Valuable When Programs Follow Them Forward
The usefulness of admissions data does not end when the incoming class is selected.
Programs can also examine what happens next.
Standard C1.01 requires PA programs to conduct ongoing self-assessment using their own data, including program-defined admissions data. As part of ARC-PA’s Sixth Edition application and self-study process, programs must also address a related question directly: “Is the admissions process effective in selecting students who can successfully complete the program?
ARC-PA does not require PA-CAT, recommend a particular admissions test, or prescribe which admissions variables a program must use.
If a program chooses to incorporate PA-CAT into admissions, PA-CAT results can become one of the variables the program examines over time alongside subsequent student outcomes.
That shifts the conversation from:
“Should we use this admissions measure?”
to a more useful question:
“What does this measure tell us within our own program?”
A PROGRAM EXAMPLE
Miami Dade College
Miami Dade College offers a useful example of what longitudinal evaluation can look like.
The program has used PA-CAT within its admissions process and has participated in several analyses examining relationships between PA-CAT results and subsequent student performance.
Published Miami Dade studies have found positive associations between PA-CAT composite scores and a range of later outcomes across different cohorts, including didactic coursework, semester GPA, PACKRAT assessments, and PANCE performance. (Exam Master PA-CAT)
Those findings should not be interpreted as meaning that a PA-CAT score determines an individual student’s future performance.
Their value is different.
They show how a program can take an admissions variable and ask:
Does this information continue to tell us something once students enter our curriculum?
That is a question programs can investigate with their own data.
Your Program Does Not Have to Rely Only on Somebody Else’s Results
Published research can provide useful context, but every PA program has its own curriculum, admissions process, student population, grading practices, and outcomes.
For that reason, program-specific analysis can be especially valuable.
Programs using PA-CAT can share de-identified student outcome data with the PA-CAT team. We can then help analyze relationships between PA-CAT scores and the program’s own outcomes at no cost to the program.
Depending on what data are available, those analyses may include:
- didactic GPA,
- individual course performance,
- PACKRAT performance, and
- PANCE performance.
The goal is not to prove that PA-CAT must be used in a particular way. It is to help a program understand what the assessment data mean within its own context.
Over multiple cohorts, that can give faculty and admissions leaders a stronger basis for evaluating how individual admissions variables contribute to the overall process.
PA-CAT and Admissions Self-Assessment Are Related—But Not the Same Thing
Because ARC-PA requires programs to evaluate admissions effectiveness, it can be tempting to connect any admissions measure directly to accreditation.
That connection needs to be made carefully.
PA-CAT is not an ARC-PA requirement, and using PA-CAT does not by itself demonstrate compliance with Standard C1.01.
C1.01 is about the program’s ongoing process of collecting data, analyzing those data, drawing conclusions, and using the findings for improvement.
PA-CAT can simply be one source of admissions data within that larger process when a program chooses to use it.
That distinction matters because the real value is not having one more number in the applicant file. The value comes from understanding what that number contributes—and then evaluating that contribution over time.
Questions to Ask Before Adding PA-CAT to Admissions
Before deciding how PA-CAT might fit, admissions teams may find it helpful to ask:
- What additional information are we trying to obtain?
- How would PA-CAT complement the measures we already use?
- How would the score be considered within our broader admissions process?
- What student outcomes would we want to examine later?
- How would we evaluate whether PA-CAT is contributing useful information within our own program?
Those questions should come before decisions about weighting, cut scores, or implementation logistics.
The goal is not simply to add an assessment.
It is to determine whether the information it provides addresses a question the program actually needs answered.
Start With What You Want to Learn
The most useful admissions measures are not necessarily the ones that generate the most data.
They are the ones that help programs answer meaningful questions.
For programs considering PA-CAT as part of admissions, the question is therefore not simply:
“Should we add another assessment?”
It is:
“What would this information add to what we already know—and how will we evaluate its value over time?”
PA-CAT can provide one additional perspective on an applicant’s prerequisite-science preparation. What a program does with that information—and how it studies the results over time—remains a program-level decision.
Explore the PA-CAT research to review program-specific findings and published analyses.
If you would like to discuss how PA-CAT could fit within your own admissions process—or how the PA-CAT team can analyze your program’s de-identified student outcomes—connect with us, we’re happy to talk through the options.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does PA-CAT replace holistic admissions?
No. PA-CAT can provide an objective measure of prerequisite science knowledge that a program considers alongside the other academic and nonacademic information in its admissions process.
Does ARC-PA require PA-CAT?
No. ARC-PA requires programs to conduct ongoing self-assessment and examine program-defined admissions data, but it does not require PA-CAT or prescribe a particular admissions assessment.
Does a PA-CAT score determine whether an applicant will succeed?
No. An individual score should not be interpreted as a guarantee of future performance. Published PA-CAT research has found associations between PA-CAT scores and later measures including PACKRAT and PANCE performance, but those relationships do not determine individual outcomes.
Can programs study PA-CAT using their own student outcomes?
Yes. Programs can provide de-identified outcome data to the PA-CAT team for program-specific analysis. This analysis is available at no cost to the program.
Does every PA program need to use PA-CAT the same way?
No. Some programs use PA-CAT during admissions. Others administer it only after the incoming cohort has been selected. The appropriate approach depends on the information the program wants and when that information would be useful.